twodoebs

Random Thoughts From Our Random Minds

Thursday, January 05, 2006

 

Doebtown's Wildcard Playoff Predictions

By: doebtown
Yeah, Stefanie . . . I KNOW it's not what you were talking about when you clamored for more non-photographic content in the New Year, but I DID want to publicly memorialize my predictions for this weekend's games so I can gloat about how good I am when I'm 100% correct on Monday morning.

WASHINGTON AT TAMPA BAY
* Washington by 3

JACKSONVILLE AT NEW ENGLAND
* New England by 10

CAROLINA AT NEW YORK GIANTS
* New York by 7

PITTSBURGH AT CINCINNATI
* Pittsburgh by 83


Comments:
I sure hope you're right about that Steelers game...that would be a major blowout...

But, I disagree with the Giants pick...I think they go down

 

**********
Well, 7 points MAY be a bit of a reach 'cause I DO think it'll be close. And I guess PART of my prediction is based on hometown loyalty. But, really, I don't think Carolina has the offense to get the best of Big Blue.
 

**********
"If they LOSE?!" "IF" a frog had wings, Big Sister, he wouldn't kick himself in the ass so much.

Nah . . . the beauty administering my own blog is that I'll NEVER have to eat my words--I'll just DELETE them!

 

**********
Well so far so good...Washington wins by 7 and New England wins by 25.
Since the games weren't as close as doebtown predicted perhaps this means the Giants will win by 14 and the Steelers will in fact win by 107.

 

**********
Well, OK--so the Giants game wasn't that "close" after all . . . here's to hopin' Pittsburgh's got better luck than New York!
 

**********
Oh, Stefanie . . . "if a frog had wings, he wouldn't kick himself in the ass so much." The operative word--and, of course, the operative word in your suggestion that if the Steelers loose I'll have to eat my words--being "if". The point is, a frog DOESN'T have wings, so there's no use in talking about how much more comfortable his hind-quarters would be if he did.

Go Steelers!

 

**********
And, BTW, if I could get my trial record to 66.6%, I'd be pretty pleased with myself. So I'm not so sure I agree with this characterization of being 2/3 as "only!"
 

**********
Well, EXCUSE me for not meeting your high literary expectations in my online banter. I've got ANOTHER expression saying basically the same thing that involves a Queen, a pair of reproductive organs that only males have, and the Queen's aspirations to be a King, but--knowing that this is a family oriented site (which is a polite way to say that I know Kati's mom checks in here every once in a while and I'm still trying to shield her from my less polished side . . . )--it doesn't seem appropriate.
 

**********
Message
 

**********
Post a Comment

Archives

April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   July 2011   August 2011   September 2011   October 2011   November 2011   December 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012   April 2012   May 2012   June 2012   July 2012   October 2012   December 2012  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Free Web Counters